Thomas John Watson Sr. was an American businessman, who served as the President, Chairman, and CEO of International Business Machines or IBM as we call it, from 1914 to 1956.
In the early 1940’s, some on the board of directors were lobbying to remove Watson as IBM’s President because inventories were too high. It was after the depression and business was not flourishing and they wanted Tom Watson out.
At that very time, a large government bid, approaching a million dollars, was on the table. The IBM Corporation and especially Thomas J. Watson Sr. needed every deal. Unfortunately, the salesman failed. IBM lost the bid. The next day, the sales rep showed up at Mr. Watson’s office. He sat down and rested an envelope with his resignation on the CEO’s desk.
As he rose to walk out, Tom Watson met him at the door, looked him in the eye and handed the envelope back to him saying, “Why would I accept this when I have just invested one million dollars in your education?”
Now, back then one million dollars was a lot of money, but if you factor in inflation, $1,000,000 in 1940 is equivalent to $18.3 Million today. This could be the story of Dave Roberts. Andrew Friedman may feel that he has so much invested in training him that he’s not taking the envelope… or firing him.
Every human being has strengths and weaknesses. As a manager of people, Andrew Friedman’s job is to maximize subordinates’ strengths and minimize their weaknesses. It’s hard to find a Manager that is better at managing his players and the clubhouse better than Dave Roberts. However, like Tommy Lasorda, he’s not a rocket scientist. He has made some bad moves that turned out good, some good moves that turned out bad and some moves that were just one step away from being genius if the players had only executed.
I have said it before and I will say it again: “The decision to pitch Clayton Kershaw to Rendon and Soto was in fact, an organizational decision.” Friedman and Doc obviously talked about it before the game. I am not going to argue or belabor the point. I don’t fault that decision and I have talked to several baseball people who have no problem with it either. I have listened to MLB commentators say they had no issue with it. The problem was Clayton failed to execute. End of story. Well, leaving Kelly in was a moronic move – so there’s that too.
I do think that Andrew Friedman will have Dave Robert’s assistants more involved in “in-game decisions” in the future. I have a feeling that Mark Prior will have a much stronger voice in pitching changes than Rick Honeycutt. Rick is a nice guy, every pitchers’ buddy… Mark Prior is much more analytical and calculated. I wanted Doc out too, but why not maximize his leadership and have his lieutenants more involved in tactical decisions? Minimize his weaknesses and maximize his strengths. That’s the way you do it.
NYC Trip
So, my oldest son’s 33 birthday was last weekend and I told him I was coming to visit him and spend the weekend. What I didn’t tell him was that his older sister and her husband and his brother, as well as his step-mom, were also coming. Patty has been his mom longer than his real mom who died when he was 9. So he was pretty surprised when we all showed up with two (bonded-bothers) kittens. He has been talking about a cat for a long time but was afraid one might get lonely. He was surprised and very happy. It was a great weekend.
You may or may not know that I write another blog and today’s post is very important. Read it if you are so inclined:
Discussion (36)
Disagree, not disagreeable
Having home field has not been all too advantageous this year.
Wildcard – both teams with Home Field advantage lost
ALDS – both teams with Home Field advantage won
NLDS – both teams both Home Field advantage lost
ALCS- both teams with Home Field advantage won
NLCS- both teams with Home Field advantage won
WS- in each of the first 6 games the team with Home Field advantage lost
Seems as if Home Field advantage is a bit over-rated.
And so much for home field advantage. But I guess it can be argued that Rendon has won 3 games in his hometown.
Stephen Strasburg just guaranteed that he is going to opt out. Scott Boras has got to be going crazy. What a great last two games for his top three clients in 2019; Gerrit Cole (Game 5), Strasburg (Game 6), and Anthony Rendon (Game 6). Game 7 is going to be fun. Scherzer vs. Greinke could be a classic.
Anthony Rendon is making a case for A nice contract with a 3-hit 5 RBI night. And so is Strasbourg who is currently being removed with one out in the 9th, no one on and a 7-2 lead.
In no way was planning to bring Kershaw in after Bueler was done for the game a bad idea……..until you realize that WB was able to hand the batton so late.
No way, no how was Kershaw needed, or wanted, to pitch the next inning to Rendon and Soto.
He did, and Rendon beat him on a great pitch.
HE HAS TO GO AFTER THAT!! His mental state had to be off at that point. His past demons has to be forefront on his mind………..I am blowing it again. This is evident by the batting practice meat he hung up there for Soto.
On top of that, letting Kelly load the bases is inexcusable in a clinch game. Letting him continue after doing so even jaw droppingly dumb, and then letting him KEEP PITCHING after the granny, was fireable. Literally on the spot. A dad coaching a Little League team on some ragged elementary school campus would pull his pitcher after loading them up.
Roberts blew the game, and unless he was ordered to keep Kershaw and Kelly in no matter the game situation(s), he should be gone. Compound that to all his other historic failure and boneheaded moves and just as foolish to keep him, as his moves.
Roberts may learn from his many mistakes and may win a WS with the Dodgers. It won’t erase the he blew 2017 for sure, made many dumb moves in 2018, and I am convinced that I would be watching the WS with LA in it right now if he does the 8th and 9th with the guys that got him there…….Kolerek and Maeda……maybe Jansen.
And by the way, there is no such thing as an untouchable player. Yes, some players are more untouchable than others, but given the right return, any player can be moved.
I would love to have Lindor in LA, but NOT because I consider him an upgrade over Corey. From what I read, Corey would remain in LA, and move over to 3B, where I believe that Corey has the skills to be gold glove caliber. Also, before I go any further I want to mention that I agree with almost everything that Mark and AC wrote.
Corey hit 26 HRs in his rookie year and hit 22 in a sophomore year that was marred by elbow problems in the latter part of that year. He then missed practically all of 2018. It’s nothing I can prove, but I believe Seager is capable of hitting 30-40’HRs. He’s actually about the same size as Bellinger, and I believe weighs a bit more.
Mark and AC mentioned how much more difficult it is to hit HRs in LA than in Cleveland. What they left out (unless I missed it) is how difficult it is to hit HRs in SD and SF, where night games are affected by the same marine layer that holds up balls hit in the air in LA. And what I don’t agree with is that Lindor has more power. The career numbers say he does, but I believe that a fully healthy Seager will hit more HRs.
But the comparison between Seager and Lindor is irrelevant to me. What’s important to me is having two All Star caliber players on the left side of our infield. And Lindor’s speed is something that the Dodgers could use, not to mention his superior defense at short.
And one other thing. If this actually happened, the Dodgers would have no need to pursue Rendon, which no doubt would free up money to be used elsewhere.
I cannot stress this enough. The new 3 batter minimum rule is going to be a game changer. Teams who build their bullpen to function properly under that new rule are going to have big advantages over teams who do not. Any trade assets the Dodgers have should be used to build the bullpen first, then starting pitching but any starting pitching needs to be a CLEAR upgrade.
No to Lindor.
I think that the major needs are a #2 or co-#1 starter, and a top closer. We will not win any title without them. I would be less focused on the starting lineup, we could get by with pretty much what we had this year. I would save whatever money and trade pieces we have to shore up the top of the rotation and the bullpen. Then we can see if we want to move around regular players. I don’t watch much of the American League, but Lindor’s stats, while good, are not overwhelming. And how many players from other teams come to Los Angeles and hit really well? Machado didn’t even do that. I am happy to see us make some changes, but we do not make very many, and I would hate to see them used up by moves which do not get us a closer and a top starter.
If the Dodgers get Lindor mostly with prospects and trade Seager, we have to look at the team with Lindor and whoever the Dodgers get for Seager. It isn’t so much whether Lindor or Seager is better, it is what we give up for Lindor and get for Seager.
Also, the Dodgers might think that it will be easier to re-sign Lindor that Seager.
Fans get emotionally attached to players. The Braintrust can’t – at least not too much.
As I have said before, Dodger players and prospects are a little like the fictitious community of Lake Woebegon, where, according to Garrison Keillor, all of the men are handsome, all of the women are strong and all of the kids are above average.
All Dodger prospects cannot be non-tradeable. The same with all Dodger players. And you can’t only be willing to trade the players that no one really values anyway. (I’ve seen a lot of trade proposals over the years here in the vein of “Let’s trade Kike Hernandez, Connor Wong and Kenta Maeda for Gerrit Cole”.)
If the Dodgers believe that they have to restructure the roster in some fashion and aren’t willing to spend big $$ and lots of years on a free agent like Cole, then they will have to trade someone good.
When the Dodgers traded Kemp to San Diego for Grandal, I was aghast. Mark called it correctly. Grandal filled an immediate need behind the plate (even if he did have trouble holding onto the ball), Kemp faded fast, and the Dodgers got salary relief.
Will the Dodgers trade Corey Seager? I have no idea. I can see the merits of holding onto him but can also see why they might not. This idea that he is untouchable is just wrong. The only untouchable players on the roster are Cody Bellinger (even though he has never produced in the post-season) and Walker Buehler.
I was hoping all the negative Doc talk would slow down but no cigar…
And then just when I thought it’s safe to go back in the water, some of us are trading Seager!!! What the heck??? …
They begin the evening news with “Good Evening,”
then proceed to tell you why it isn’t!!!
As MT reminded us “Seager will spend this winter getting into better overall athletic training and conditioning”.. Easy Peasy…
Soon I’ll be back to Camelback and anxious to how Verdugo and Seager looks!!!
I wish I knew what AF is going to do, but I don’t know and I’m sure a majority here are clueless…
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong…i
Thank you SoCalGrinch and SoCalBum. I should have known that.
Agreed SoCalBum, but what stat is OJT? By the way, Mark, nice photos. Glad you had a good family visit in NewYork. Those times are precious.
Until this post season I was in Doc’s corner 100%, but his handling of bullpen (not Kershaw) in game 5 was a brain cramp I cannot overlook, or forgive. Dodgers have already made it clear that Roberts returns for 2020, and I too hope that his OJT is complete, but he seems like a very slow learner and another post season bullpen blunder appears more likely than not.
Nice family Mark.
Do not trade Seager. As I said in the last thread, nobody knows what Freidman is going to do.
I agree with AC. Doc does not see what is right in front of him when he manages. He does not adjust as the game goes on. Pitching Kershaw was predetermined. I hope Doc gets some advice from the pitching coach and bench coach. Doc needs help.
Nice family, Mark!
To continue with the last thread on Lindor, the comments closed before I could post this:
If the Lindor rumor has any legs, I’m all for it. He is a player I’ve thought about for the last 3 years and I think it would be a significant upgrade at SS. Acquiring a gold glove SS is rare, especially one who hits as well as Lindor does. ROY and 4 time allstar.
What AC didn’t mention about Lindor is that he is a better doubles machine than Corey and has had 30+ HR’s the last 3 seasons. These two stats alone would have very high appeal to the FO as we all know that the Dodgers are built to hit HR’s. Lindor has 1433 Total Bases in 5 years. Corey has 910 and has never reached 30 HR’s. Add Lindor’s SB record and he is clearly the superior player.
Career-wise, Lindor has way more RBI’s than Corey both at home and away. AC’s stats are only for last season, which was not great for Lindor but still better than Corey’s overall. He is also a natural base stealer with great speed. The last 2 years he has 20+ SB’s! He usually bats 2nd in the order.
He is faster both in fielding and base running, more power both in HR’s and total bases, more RBI’s, and not injury prone like Corey. Smaller in size makes a difference at SS.
What is it going to take to get him? I couldn’t and won’t answer this. If AF is seriously interested, I’m sure he would get it done and I wouldn’t argue with who he would throw in. The key is AF’s real interest.