The Stuntmen

In 1988, the Dodgers won the World Series with a rag-tag bunch of bench players, junkyard dogs, and stuntmen, including Mickey Hatcher, Rick Dempsey, Mike Davis, Danny Heep, and Dave Anderson. The bench was important to the last world championship and I believe that this year’s bench is immensely better.

Hey, these guys aren’t starters, but many of them would be starters on other teams. Due to arbitration and the like, this could be the last season these guys are together. They are “all in” wanting to get a World Championship. They know their roles and I am assuming that this will be the starting eight:

  • C – Will Smith
  • 1B – Max Muncy
  • 2B – Gavin Lux
  • SS – Corey Seager
  • 3B – Justin Turner
  • LF – Joc Pederson
  • CF – Cody Bellinger
  • RF – Alex Verdugo

Those are the likely starters, so let’s look at the Dodgers bench options:

  • Austin Barnes (C) – AB is an elite defensive catcher and very highly ranked in pitch framing. His hitting has been atrocious the past two years – maybe he has had difficulty in adjusting to playing so little. He does have a potential offensive upside but will need to display it. In 2017, he hit .289 with a .408 OB%. I think he is a better hitter than he has shown the past two years, but he has to do it. He can also play 2B and 3B in a pinch. He qualifies as a “stuntman.” He’s also a great teammate… and that means a lot. Currently, he is being pushed by Keibert Ruiz.
  • Kike Hernandez (IF, OF) – Enrique plays every position (including C and P). He is both hated and loved as a Dodger backup. He is a plus defender at just about any position and has a rocket arm. He is adored by his teammates and frustrating to the average fan. At age 28, I think we will see a better version of Kike… or he will regress to the mean. He has hit 21 and 17 HR the past two seasons and hits lefties much better than righties. This guy is an awesome backup. I had higher hopes for him, but he has not delivered. He does have a flair for the dramatic and that is something!
  • Chris Taylor – (2B, SS, LF, CF, RF) – CT3 is a good defender at SS and in the outfield. He is a career .262 batter with a .331 OB%, which is pretty much what you can expect. His career .772 OPS is great for such a role player. CT3 is a guy you want to go to war with.
  • AJ Pollock (LF, CF) – AJ is 32 and on the downhill slide of his career, he is essentially the Dodger’s 4th outfielder, although he will platoon with Joc Pederson in LF. If healthy, he’s capable of putting up some good numbers and while he can play CF in a pinch, he’s no longer an everyday CF. Until I see otherwise, AJ is a blunder by the Dodgers’ Front Office. $18 Million doesn’t buy what it used to. I hope he makes me eat big-time crow.
  • Matt Beaty (3B, 1B, LF) – Matt is the only LH hitter of the bunch, but it’s a strongly LH lineup with Muncy, Lux, Seager, Pederson, Bellinger, and Verdugo being lefty hitters. I expect to see Matt log a lot of time at 3B in the Spring. Matt is a professional hitter… he’s our Dave Hansen.

It’s likely that the Dodgers will just carry 5 stuntmen, but it is possible that they will carry another LH bat and just 12 pitchers. That bat could be Edwin Rios or Zach McKinstry and I have left off Tyler White who could be a reclamation project like Turner, Taylor, and Muncy but the fact that he is RH goes against him… or not! Maybe since he’s RH, he is a lock to make the team… what do I know?

I also think that these stuntmen (at least some of them) will benefit from another year under Robert Van Scoyoc. That same basic lineup (minus Freese, plus Lux) is intact and they led the NL in Runs and Home Runs in 2019. It would not surprise me if they are even better in 2020. As much as some hate analytics, they are scientifically proven and sustainable. Incremental growth is part of the science.

Here’s the thing: You never know who gets hot in Spring Training or who gets injured. That’s why depth is so important. The Dodgers are in the catbird seat, but so many fans see it differently. If you want to revel in negativity and swill, let me know and I will send you to a website where you will right at home” “Friedman is an idiot and should be fired!” “The Dodgers won’t spend because they don’t want to win.” “We are doomed.” “The sky is falling.” If you eat that stuff up, I have a prepaid one-way ticket for you. It’s easy to get there. Just take

The Highway to Hell

This article has 81 Comments

  1. Which dodgers will get shafted in arbitration. We know the dodgers want to the luxury tax champions.

    1. None. Under Friedman’s tenure all Dodgers players eligible for arbitration have negotiated contracts with the team before arbitration

    2. Wow! I guess you weren’t aware that the Dodgers rarely go to arbitration. The past two years they have signed all their arbitration-eligible players. All this fiction is in your mind, James. You might want to seek help.

        1. That’s a classic form of argument, when you don’t have facts, attack the person. You should switch over to a Giant Board. They might find you marginally entertaining. Not so much here.

          1. nothing but a troll. I believe it inhabits various sites using different names, but the intent is the same — trolling

  2. Fanfest is upon us. Mr burns shouldn’t talk er gollum. Pressure should be on to make moves before the event. A lot of frustrated fans will be their. Showing up empty handed is not a good look and will feed into the narrative that the dodgers are cheap and never pull the trigger.

      1. My ex wife HATED that song
        So James, you want her #? You two might hit it off
        You might be thanking me.

  3. To me, there’s either still some work to do before the Spring begins, or things aren’t going to plan. With Chargois in Japan, the 40 man stands at 39. This includes Tyler White, who is out of options and would make for an all right handed bench if no other moves are made.

    Looking at your list of starters and bench players, I can anticipate unnecessary platooning in order to get ABs for Taylor, Kike and to split ABs among 4 outfielders that all deserve to start.

    After seeing a 13 man pitching staff for the better part of as long as I can remember, I doubt they would be willing to go with a 12 man staff with so many young pitchers projected to be there. Especially when they’re already going to have an extra position player that they aren’t used to having.

  4. Jamey, Jamey, Jamey!!! The Merriam Webster of LADT
    M.T. – Mickey and the the Stuntmen… Be still oh heart of mine… That crew brought a lot of joy to the Ravine…

  5. Read this morning that the Dodgers are still one of the teams in the mix for Josh Donaldson. Given that he’s reported to have 4 year offers and is tied to draft pick compensation, I wonder if that’s something the Dodgers would even consider.

    1. The most i would give to Donaldson is 2 year contract. In 4 years he will be like Freese the most. Not worth it. Let Twins or Braves have him.

    1. I’m not sure it matters how weak the division is and neither is Las Vegas, as only the Yankees at 3/1 are ranked higher than the Dodgers at 6/1 and the Astros at 7/1 to win the W.S. The next closest NL team is Atlanta at 12/1.

      https://news.wagertalk.com/world-series-odds

      ps: the Fanfest is free to enter – maybe you should put on your Yankee jersey and parade around like the town crier yelling : “the Dodgers are cheap – they play in a weak division – downs with ‘Mr. Burns’. “

    2. I’m not sure as always, but think the West has had the most World Series Winners in the last 10 years, (3), and most World Series participants (5).

      Usually a very strong Division. Don’t let last year’s run away victory cloud it.

  6. Dodgers Should sign Will Harris or other Experienced arm like Hudson still on market. Also should get either Wood or Walker or both for depth and possible bargain starting pitching.

    1. Hudson has had exactly one really good year out of his last nine years checking in with a 2.47 ERA last year. Sadler is most likely the guy to be replaced, who checked in with a 2.14 ERA and is 4 years younger. Will Harris is solid, but he’s 35 and is looking for a 3 year deal. I don’t think that either of those guys are much better than guys we already have.

      Jansen
      Treinen
      Kelly
      Baez
      Ferguson
      Alexander
      Stripling
      Sadler

      There is no sure thing improvement remaining on the free agent market. Hudson’s got similar stuff to the Floros and Sadlers that are already on the roster. If you’re going to really improve the bullpen at this point, it’s going to have to be via trade.

  7. I read somewhere that Guggenheim will sell the Dodgers at some point over 3 billion, Who could be next in line to buy our beloved Dodgers.

    1. Whether or not this is someone just speculating, Guggenheim is in the business of making money, so it makes sense to sell when they can maximize their return on investment. It would be nice to have a filthy rich owner with a big ego that just wants to have Championships for his own legacy and ego.

  8. JP Morosi is saying the odds are now at about 50/50 that Arenado will be traded. I assume he means before the start of the season. Says Dodgers have shown interest but aren’t the front runners.
    He has a full no trade so that might eliminate some teams and everyone knows the Rox would not be anxious to trade him in division so that makes it less likely he comes here.
    OK, I’m opening the bidding – what would you give up to get Arenado, and let’s assume the Rockies give a team a window to negotiate with Arenado in order to remove the opt out he has after 2021. If that opt out isn’t there you have him for 6 years at 34.5 mil AAV plus whatever you do to eliminate the opt out.

  9. Moya,
    1) it should be “there” not “their” at the fanfest.
    2) AF may not be perfect, but over the past 8 years, he’s been a helluva lot better GM than anyone one else in baseball.
    3) FYI, I would suggest not getting into a battle of wits with MT. Your chance of success is somewhere between nil and none so quit making yourself look like an idiot on the most knowledgeable Dodger site on the internet.

    1. Bad argument that AF is better than all the other GMs when he hasn’t won the big prize. You have to do better than that if you’re calling someone else an idiot in the same post. At least you have good grammar.

      1. Is that the sole standard of what makes a good GM, winning the big prize? I’m relatively confidant that if AF resigned from the Dodgers today, he would absolutely have no problem getting a job with any of the other 39 teams.

        1. It’s funny 2D2, I really can’t understand how you can seriously make the claim that every other team wants Friedman. I’ll start by stating the obvious. He was a free agent this year, yet there was only 1 rumor of another team being interested in him. If he was clearly the best GM, wouldn’t the Yankees out bit us for his services like they did with Cole?

          Yes, in order to say he’s the best GM, he has to win a Championship. That’s the start of the conversation, then you have to compare him to others that have won. Start with Theo Epstein who broke 2 100 year droughts. To clearly say he’s the best, he needs multiple just to be on par with Epstein. He’s been a GM for 13 years total, no championships.

          So, what makes you think he’s the best? The farm system is very good, yes. Is it the top farm system, no. He had a couple of teams with well over 100 wins, that’s pretty good. But, each of those years, there were several teams with over 100 wins and he barely broke 90 the other three years. He also inherited a 94 win team, and only beat that mark 2 of 5 years so far. So, how is he clearly the best? During his 13 years as a GM many World Series winners had lower payrolls. Why not give credit to those GMs? Doing more with less? For you to claim that he’s the best GM in baseball is really just silly. If you were completely objective, not looking at him from the eyes of a life long Dodger’s fan, maybe you can make a case that he’s in the top ten.

          1. 2D2 AF is a good gm,But considering where they draft as far as position, I have to give more credit to scouting , and minor league coaches.

          2. 59inrow – I have never said that AF is the best GM in baseball, though many others in the know have. That said, he’s pretty damn good. My sole question was if winning the WS was the sole standard for determining whether one is a good GM. Moreover, if the standard is that you must win the WS to be considered the best, applying that logic, how could anyone ever claim that Mike Trout is currently the best player in baseball, which he is, since he hasn’t won a WS and he barely makes the playoffs?

            Additionally, it’s hard to make an affirmation of fact, based on a rumor. If AF was truly a “free agent” and announced that he was not returning to the Dodgers, he would absolutely not have a problem getting a job in baseball. Perhaps that’s “silly” and non” objective” to you, but I’ll stand by my position that he’s a great GM, and between Cashman, Epstein and him an argument can be made that he is the best.

          3. I have resigned myself that you really don’t understand and simply can’t help it

  10. Beatty could well be the pinch hitter that Hansen was but I don’t think the Dodgers have a Manny Mota yet to pinch hit from the right side. Hernandez, Taylor, and Pollock whiff too much to be good pinch hitters.

    Hernandez’ best defensive positions are SS, 2B, RF, and LF and Taylor’s best are SS, CF, LF. I don’t think they do well at 3B. I hope Beatty can develop into a good defensive third baseman but a righty bat backup there would be better.

    1. Beaty is one of my favorites. Recently reported that he is working out at Dodger Stadium with the strength coaches, and taking ground balls and fly balls.

  11. Talent wise that 1988 team had the CY winner and MVP, but overall was not a very talented team. Their rotation was Orel Hershiser and the Question Marks. Tim Leary was not a good pitcher before 1988 or after. After pitching to a 3-11 record and 4.76 ERA in 1987, Leary posted a 17-11 record and 2.91 ERA in 1988. For his career, Leary was 78-105 and a 4.36 ERA. But he did have that 1988 season.

    Their #3 starter was a rookie; Tim Belcher at 26. Belcher went 12-6 also with a 2.91 ERA. After Belcher it gets very sketchy. A quickly aging (arm wise) Fernando was done by August and was not good up to that point. The #5 was a 43 year old Don Sutton who was done at the end of June. Sutton did come back for one last start on August 9 for his last ML appearance.

    The Dodgers had to rely on a very unheralded Shawn Hillegas (23) who was called up in June, and later traded (August) to ChiSox for the great Ricky Horton. They also brought up 20 year old Ramon Martinez who got in 6 starts in August and September.

    The Dodgers were so desperate for pitching that they traded their best hitter outside of Gibson, Pete Guerrero, for lefty John Tudor. Just like Gibson was hurt for the WS, the pitcher they were hoping would be a big game pitcher for them went down in WS Game 2 with a severe elbow injury and was done after 1.1 IP.

    Their regular lineup was:
    C – Mike Scioscia – .257
    1B – Franklin Stubbs – .223
    2B – Steve Sax – .277
    SS – Alfredo Griffin – .199
    3B – Jeff Hamilton – .236
    LF – Kirk Gibson – .290
    CF – John Shelby – .263
    RF – Mike Marshall – .277

    They had three hitters with 10 or more HRs – Gibson (25), Marshall (20), and Shelby (10), and the same three were the only hitters with 60+ RBIs – Marshall (82), Gibson (20), and Shelby (64).

    But somehow, some way this team beat the much better NYM team to get to the WS and then beat the much much better Oakland A’s to become WS champs.

    I will absolutely admit that the roster structure in 1988 is not a good recipe to follow, but the point is that a team can somehow pull it together to win in a short series. There are way too many out there who have already opined that 2020 Dodger roster is not good enough to win the NL much less WS. That opinion was made right after the Dodgers did not sign Gerrit Cole, a player they made a $300MM offer to with a better AAV than the offer he accepted, because Cole always wanted to be a NYY. The Dodgers made the best offer and once NYY went to $324MM and gave him the 9th year, Cole told Boras he was signing with NYY. Should they have offered $400MM from the start? It is a straw man only because we will never know. But it is also a question that those anti-AF refuse to answer. I still do not think it would have mattered. NYY would still have got a chance to beat it and they probably would have. Regardless, Cole was going to sign with NYY with whatever their best offer was.

    The last time I checked runs were very important to winning a baseball game, and the Dodgers led the NL in runs scored in 2019, and figure to be even more prolific this year with a healthier Verdugo, Pollock, JT, and Seager. They will get a full year out of Will Smith. Maybe Bellinger becomes more consistent throughout the year. We will get a chance to see if Lux is the real thing and if he is, the team will be even more prolific with him in the lineup. It could be a very exciting offense.

    I agree that starting two very unproven and mostly untested young pitchers does not loom well, but that is only on paper. Julio Urias was at one time the best LHP prospect in MLB and at 23 seems about ready to showcase what he does have. Dustin May is one of the best pitching prospects today in MLB and will get his chance to show what he has. I really do not care if Urias and May only pitch 150 innings or 140 innings. The Dodgers depth is second to no team. I still believe Strip will get the chance to start in lieu of May, but AF and Doc may believe that it is best for the team for May to be #5 and Strip to start in the pen.

    The Dodgers could have traded for Lindor and/or Betts if they want to trade Gavin Lux or Dustin May. The Dodgers are not trading Lux or May for a one or two year fix. And understanding that AF values starting pitching at any level, probably has Gonsolin and Gray only available for the best of the best. I still think AF will get some additional players, but it is going to be for a price he dictates as he did for Machado and Darvish. It may happen before ST but it may be at the trade deadline. But he will do something.

    Dodgerrick, no I do not believe that on paper the starting pitching is better without Ryu going into the season. But I fully expect Walker Buehler to improve over last year and I do think that Urias and either Strip or May will be better in total than Ryu and Hill. Hill appeared in 13 games and pitched 58.2 innings.

    So while some of you have given up on this year’s Dodgers team because they could not sign Gerrit Cole, I am going to enjoy watching this team grow and mature as a team and get ready for the Downtown LA parade in November. Yes I realize that many of you consider me naive (and are undoubtedly correct), but I refuse to quit on a team before they have even started ST.

    1. No one is quitting on this season’s Dodgers – at least they shouldn’t.

      They still have the top-scoring offense in the NL from last year. While I expect Cody Bellinger to regress to the mean, I expect a better season out of Cory Seager and AJ Pollock now that both are healthy. And while we don’t know what Gavin Lux will do in his 1st full season of MLB, he certainly has the potential to be very good. To me the one offensive question mark is behind the plate. Will Smith cratered in September and he will need to make adjustments to the league as it adjusts to him.

      Defensively, the team will be as good or better than last year’s team and last season they were very good indeed.

      The NL West will be more competitive next season – I expect that the young Padres will improve from last season if they can find enough starting pitcher from their flock of prospects and that the D-Backs will surprise a bit as well. That being said, if the Dodgers don’t win the division by 10+ games next year I will be disappointed.

      The issue is still pitching.

      The Dodgers have 2 aces, a guy who usually pitches well for 3 or 4 months per season (Maeda) and 2 question marks. Maeda’s ERA went from 3.76 in the 1st half to 4.50 in the 2nd half last year. (In 2018 it went from 3.12 to 5.35.) Urias won’t pitch more than 130-140 innings next year. I like his stuff and May’s stuff too, but Urias has been babied by the Dodgers his entire career (not that it’s helped him) and he’s never built up arm strength, while May is only 22 and has 3 years of minor league pitching experience.

      As to “depth” – what major league depth do the Dodgers have in the event of an injury to Buehler or Kershaw?

      And replacing Ryu – 14 – 5, 2.32, 1.007 WHIP, 2nd in Cy Young. I don’t expect that he will pitch as well in 2020 as he did last year, but if he remains injury free in 2020 (I know, a big “if”), there is no way that either Urias or May replicates this level of performance. And while Rich Hill didn’t pitch much last year (I never suggested that the Dodgers resign Hill or sign Ryu to a 4 year deal so that’s not the point), he did pitch to 4 – 1, 2.45, 1.125 WHIP, 72 K in 58 IP. So no, I don’t expect one of the kids to replicate this either.

      Then there’s the bullpen – Wild Man Kelly and Wild Man Treinen to add to an increasingly ineffective Jansen and Pedro Baez form the back end of the ‘pen. Notwithstanding our host’s encomiums to Kelly last year, he did what he always has done – pitched very poorly at times and well at others but the bad outweighed the good. His career numbers speak for themselves. Treinen is this year’s Kelly – we hope he does well but his career doesn’t support this hope. Maybe he turns back into the 2018 version but his career doesn’t suggest that he will.

      What I hope for this year (that we didn’t get last year) is a deadline deal for a difference maker, either in the ‘pen or the rotation.

      What I hoped for this off season was the acquisition of a difference maker. While Spring Training doesn’t start until 2/22 and there is still time, it is looking increasingly unlikely that the Dodgers will acquire one before the season starts. So while I expect that the Dodgers will win the NL West, I would like to see them acquire high impact pitching before the post-season starts.

  12. I believe AJ Pollock’s contract averages $13 million over five years when you include the player option for the fifth. Otherwise it would be $13.75 over four years, which is actually pretty good in terms of today’s contract numbers. I’m also not sure I would toss players at 32 into the decline bucket.

    Maybe the Dodgers are still pursuing Donaldson or maybe they’re not. Looking at it from the point of the Dodgers, based on what they’ve actually said, expressed concern about and Justin Turner at third, it would seem somewhat illogical for them to chase a 34 year old third baseman to replace one who is 35.

    It has been referenced numerous times by Stan Kasten and Andrew Friedman that one of the main goals of the team is to not end up, like the Philadelphia Phillies did, with an expensive, aging roster. It would seem that’s what Donaldson would bring if, indeed, he has four year contracts already on the table. Now, maybe they think he will age better than some. Still, it would seem more likely they would want a younger player like Kris Bryant with a couple of years left on the contract.

    The Rockies trading Nolan Arenado makes absolutely no sense. He’s the face of the franchise, unless, of course he suddenly wants out of Denver. Even if that’s the case, I can’t imagine a scenario they trade him to their arch rivals, the Dodgers. Then again, if the Dodgers are ready to include Gavin Lux, Keibert Ruiz, Tony Gonsolin and Dustin May in the deal, making it a win for the Rockies, they might consider it. How many of you believe Friedman would make that deal? Yah, not happening.

    So, the Dodgers made $95/96 million in profit last year, the most in baseball, and that figures to increase with numerous revenue opportunities, including streaming, in the future. I’m guessing they can pretty much spend whatever they want on payroll and not miss a beat. If they could offer $300 million to Gerrit Cole, then money isn’t all that big of a concern. But don’t expect see them toss it around just to make something happen. It has to be for a difference maker, an elite player.

    Mark Walter has said several times that they have no intention of selling the team. Why would they? It’s a cash generating machine and the value will continue to increase. It’s already increased over a $1.3 billion from the time they bought it.

  13. James, there are 29 other teams , how about you go find one to like. Or do whatever it is that yanks your chain.

      1. James, please tell us what you would do if you were GM and how you would go about doing it.

      2. Name calling, making fun, bullying – none of this is persuasive or interesting.

        You would find people more responsive to your argument if you actually made an argument.

        Simply saying that the Dodgers haven’t won the Series in 7 years isn’t really enough. They haven’t won since 1988 so it’s been 31 years. Friedman doesn’t have to answer for anything that happened before he got here 5 years ago.

        The Dodgers have been competitive every year he’s run things. They have gotten the salaries back under control (no team in baseball would run with the salaries that Friedman inherited every season), improved the player development system, and found diamonds in the rough overlooked by other teams (like Taylor and Muncy).

        Are there weaknesses? Sure – I don’t think that the Dodgers have added a difference maker this off-season and I believe that they need one for the post-season in 2020. The starting rotation looks weaker to me than it has in years and the bullpen still contains multiple question marks.

        As a fan, I don’t like overreliance on analytics and the “3 true outcomes” type baseball that the Dodgers increasingly play.

        There is room for constructive criticism, and thoughtful criticism.

        You should try offering some.

  14. Don Larsen has died at the age of 90. His only claim to fame was his perfect game in the 1956 World Series. I saw that game on TV and saw the called 3rd strike on Dale Mitchell. I remember yelling at the TV saying it was a ball not a strike as it looked outside.

    Mitchell hardly ever struck out (112K’s in 3984AB’s). Even though I thought it was a ball it was too close to take w/ 2 strikes. IDK but perhaps the umpire helped a bit so he could be part of history also.

  15. There has been some talk about what player has options and what player does not have options. I have always felt that a player with no options does not deserve to make the final roster when a player with more options than he has, but is a better player, does not.

    Is the number of options transferred from an old team to a new one? Maybe they should look into the options system. If a pitcher gets called up in an emergency to pitch from the minors, maybe he should not be charged with an option, if he is. There are some players with a lot of options after being called up often. Why are they not on the roster permanently instead of being send back down? Hard to understand this system for me, but I think everyone should have a chance.

    1. DBM, option rules are not going to change. Once the player is added to the 40 man, that player has three options. If a player is sent down (optioned) he can be optioned any number of times during that year. But if he sent down the following year, that is a second option. Once the player has exhausted his three options, he can no longer be sent down without being subject to waivers. Basically that player is designated for assignment. If he clears waivers he can become a FA or accept the assignment to the MiLB team. The remaining number of options follows the player if he is traded.

      Casey Sadler has no options remaining, so if he is not on the 26 man he will be DFA and must pass thru waivers. I am fairly certain that some team would pick him up on waivers. Unless AF believes Casey will be a member of the 26 man for the full season, he should move him for a low tier lottery pick.

  16. Thanks so much AC, for the explanation. It is clearer to me now. I did not realize it was on a year basis and not just the number of call ups. So much to learn, so little time to learn it. Wonder why they do not put Sadler on the 40-man, replacing Chargois.

  17. New Years resolution for everyone on this site. No name calling!

    I’m trying, Ringo. I’m trying real hard…

  18. James Moya,

    I am getting e-mails from other commenters and while we do value discourse and dissenting commentary on this blog, you are becoming a troll. You accuse me of saying that everything AF does is great, right after I write this:
    “Until I see otherwise, AJ is a blunder by the Dodgers’ Front Office. $18 Million doesn’t buy what it used to. I hope he makes me eat big-time crow.”

    Then you say: “Just remember that a good portion of the roster that gets the club to the playoffs every year (Bellinger, Seager, Kershaw, Jansen, Baez, Stripling, Turner, Ryu, Pederson, Verdugo) were all signed drafted or acquired under Ned Colleti and Logan White.

    Of course, and Friedman didn’t trade them away.

    Dude, I don’t know where you are coming from with a lot of your takes, but I know where you are going if this trollish behavior keeps up. Have a take and do not suck. Right about now, you do!

  19. I am a lifelong dodger fan and no matter how frustrated I am still a dodger fan. I am so happy that we are annual division champs. I am also thankful that the Dodgers have been in 2 World Series recently. We have a fantastic team, a quality farm system, and a bright future. I think AF has put our team in position to be competitive for years to come. But, as to how AF stacks up with other gms I don’t think he can be one of the greats without a World Series victory. I also do not think kershaw can be considered in the same company as koufax without a World Series ring. I realize that this is my personal opinion and you can throw all the stats out there to counter but it is an opinion.

    I could go on about the dead money, the terrible signings, on and on about the bullpen etc but will not. I am glad we have AF but to be an all time great he has to have a World Series title on his resume. I won’t have a vote on his legacy but when that time comes maybe he will have a couple of LA Dodger World Series titles. In that case my opinion would most likely change.

  20. The Mookie Betts rumors are heating up.

    I have heard from undisclosed sources that the deal is Betts and Price for Verdugo, Ruiz, and Grove, with the Dodgers assuming all of Prices contract. I cannot vouch for the veracity of the rumor, but I might do that!

    1. If that trade were made, I hope absorbing all of Prices’ salary wouldn’t affect what the Dodgers were willing to pay Betts as a free agent.

      If I am Boston that is exactly what I would do. If I am LA that trade needs money coming from Boston or I already had a deal to send Pollock to NYM for Diaz. Then platoon Joc and Taylor/Kike’ and extend Joc through 2022.

      Without thinking about the team being better or not, I personally would enjoy watching Betts more than Verdugo as the latter hasn’t been a Dodger long enough for me to be all that loyal to him.

    2. I have no problem taking on Price’s bad years for one year of Betts. He’s one of the top 5 players in the league, can play multiple positions and is that ever elusive right handed bat. Hell, if I were GM, I would give them more.

      1. Somewhere among Betts, Seager, Lux, Muncy, and Beatty there is a longer range third baseman.

    3. Betts and Price for Verdugo, Ruiz, and Grove, with the Dodgers assuming all of Prices contract.

      I wouldn’t do that deal. Anyone who believes Betts could be extended by the Dodgers instead of becoming a free agent, I have a bridge I’d like to sell you and whatever you are taking that makes you so optimistic please share some with me.

  21. 1. Lux 2B
    2. Betts RF
    3. Bellinger CF
    4. Muncy 1B
    5. Turner 3B
    6. Seager SS
    7. Pederson/Pollock LF
    8. Smith C

    Dang, I would hate to lose Ruiz…

    1. I’d hate to lose Ruiz as well. But catcher is the one position the Dodgers have talent in abundance. If Ruiz were to be moved we’d still have Smith, Wong and Cartaya. That is still some impressive depth at the position. And I really like Wong. He’s fast, can play 2b and has some serious raw power. Albeit with a lot of swing and miss. He really seemed to take well to AA late in the season.

      If it means keeping Lux and May, I could live with giving up Ruiz.

      1. Ditto. This seems like a very fair deal, other than assuming all of Price’s contract ($31M AAV; owed $96M over next 3 seasons at age 34). If Betts is paid $28M then Dodgers are adding a net $50M in CBT payroll. I think the Bosox would have to take back either Maeda, or Pollock — at a minimum, or send a bunch of cash to the Dodgers in the deal. And/or Dodgers have other trades in place to reduce payroll. In addition to Wong, Dodgers still have Austin Barnes under team control through 2022, Rocky Gale at AAA who is a fine defensive catcher, Steve Berman, Hunter Feduccia, and others if stop gap is needed.

        1. Dodgers do have a lot of options at catcher. I’d also hate to see Verdugo in Boston. But Lux and our young pitchers have to be off limits. We’ve seen this offseason that even being willing to drop $300m is no guarantee you’ll land the best pitcher on the market. Having May, Gray and Gonsolin in the system is more valuable than catching depth. I also agree with those that think Jeter Downs can be converted to CF. And we have DJ Peters knocking on the door. He is more versatile in the OF than many would expect. I could live with giving up Verdugo and Ruiz. If that happens, unlikely as it may be, I certainly hope the Dodgers would make a push to lock in Betts. That would be a lot to give up for an expensive aging SP and one year of Mookie. But it tips the scale for me. I’d do it.

          1. I don’t think Dodgers take Price unless it is 100% committed to doing whatever it takes to sign Betts to an extension. I really like Ruiz; I think he could become a generational catcher with both offense and defense, but Betts is only 27 and one of the top 10 players in MLB; he is worth the gamble to acquire. But, if Cleveland says that it will trade Lindor and Clevinger for a similar package that includes another couple of prospects like Downs and Gonsolin then I make the deal with Cleveland

  22. Mark, what chance do you give AF signing Betts long term or is he just a one year rental if this deal went through

    1. My $.02:
      – Betts not represented by Scott Boras
      – After 2020 season Dodgers have Turner, Treinen, Pederson, et al as free agents for total of $47M; Kershaw, Jansen, and Seager free agents after 2021.

      As long as Betts is not worried about the “Hollywood Lifestyle” then I think the Dodgers would have an excellent chance of signing him to an extension. They can discuss an extension with Betts agents throughout the season and post season.

  23. I agree with Mark about who should make up the Dodgers offense. The starters he mentioned and his initial bench of Barnes, Hernandez, Taylor, Beaty, and then Pollock who should platoon with Joc. I also believe that this offense will be better than last year if Doc doesn’t screw it up. Again barring Doc’s decision making I see upside at 5 positions.

    Catcher: Having Smith for a full year and the possibility of Ruiz knocking Barnes off the roster sometime during the season.

    2B: Having Lux for a full season instead of all the combinations the Dodgers had last season that included too much of Hernandez and Taylor.

    SS: Hopefully Seager starts to hit lefties like he did when he first arrived before his injuries.

    OF: Having a full season of Verdugo, not only because of Verdugo’s production, but also to keep Pollock from being anything more than Joc’s platoon partner.

    OF: If Doc goes with a strict platoon of Joc and Pollock, I believe this platoon will put up better numbers than most if not all 1 man outfielders in MLB.

    Also watch out for a possible DJ Peters arrival that could knock either Hernandez or Taylor off the roster, most likely Hernandez. But Friedman and Doc might wait for a September call up.

    I’m not worried about our offense at all except we have Doc calling the shots, so who knows.

    I’m concerned about our pitching, especially our bullpen and especially because again we have doc calling the shots. The closest we can get to a Doc proof bullpen the better off the team will be.

  24. That would be an interesting deal, Mark, and yes, you would have to do it. The Dodgers have lots of depth at catcher. Jon Morosi is suggesting that multiple players could be going back to the Dodgers. Does that mean more than Betts and Price? Wondering if the deal might expand like the Punto Trade. Who else would the Red Sox want to dump for salary relief? If LA is trading for Betts then no one and that includes the Red Sox should outbid the Dodgers when he becomes a free agent.

    1. The Boston and Dodgers rosters align very well for an old time block buster trade with several players from each team switching uniforms. A guy I would love to see in the Dodgers bullpen is Brandon Workman.

  25. This would be my team in a few years:
    LF Verdugo
    SS Lindor
    CF Bellinger
    1B Hoese
    3B Seager
    RF Peters
    2B Lux
    C Smith
    SP:
    1 Buehler
    2 Snell
    3 Urias
    4 May
    5 Gray
    LET THE KIDS PLAY

  26. If you were the Indians GM, do you send a back door message to AF letting him know that you would accept that same package for Lindor and Clevinger if the Dodgers would add Jeter Downs, and Tony Gonsolin?

  27. 59, I know we’d have to give up a lot more to Cleveland but there is no comparison between Price and Clevenger in salary and stuff! The Cleveland deal makes us the best team in baseball but long term it would be tough to give up both Lux and May and others!

    1. Here’s my Top Ten list on why the Betts trade better…

      1) I don’t give a crap about the money, so this doesn’t have any effect on my decision at all.
      2) Price absolutely pitched like an Ace against us in the WS.
      3) Urias and May might be better than Clevenger and Price once the post season comes around, so I’m not as concerned about the pitching part of the trade.
      4) Betts is a better hitter than Lindor
      5) Betts bats right handed all the time, so the lineup is more balanced with him.
      6) Two players have to change positions and Lux gets blocked by a Lindor trade.
      7) The defense is much better in the Betts trade because Muncy won’t have to play second base
      8) The Lindor trade will almost certainly be the end of Corey Seager as a Dodger.
      9) Betts is probably the best defensive right fielder in the game and has done so in a difficult place to play right field.
      10) Betts is a hell of a human being. I saw a special about him bringing homeless people food in the freezing weather after one the World Series games in Boston. It really touched me.

  28. You have to trust AF as a judge of talent and if he says Lux is untouchable then he is. But I like the Cleveland deal better. Can’t see AF giving Price 100 mil on the downside of his career. I think it’s a ploy to get Cleveland to be more reasonable

  29. I love it when folks just move existing players around like they are chess pieces. Oh, we’ll just move Seager to third. Does anyone know if Seager wants to move to 3rd? It takes tremendous ability and pride to be a professional shortstop. Starting as a kid the best player is at short. Many move for various reasons to other positions as they move through pro ball but mostly because they can’t cut it at short. Mickey Mantle was an error machine before moving to center. Many move because they don’t have the arm strength or the feet for the Show. But Seager is a bonafide big league shortstop and am sure he takes great pride in that fact. Maybe he would consider a move to help the team for a Frankie Lindor. But maybe not. It seems to me like its Seager’s job. If he wants to continue there then he should be given the opportunity to play there or be traded to another team if the Dodgers think they can improve at shortstop. Pride in your skills at the most difficult position on the field means a lot and is not easily given up.

  30. Cleveland is less likely to deal lindor with 2 years left. They still think they can win. The Cleveland possibility of a deal would cost much more in personnel.

    I actually like the possibility in dealing with Boston. Betts gives us exactly what we need a great player on defense and offense with speed and right handed who is playing for a contract. Price may not have anything left but he might give us some innings and who knows maybe more if he can stay healthy. I think we need a starting pitcher who can keep the innings down for the others. No way AF is going to pay his whole salary without some fairness in the deal. But, if we overpay somewhat with money I would rather that than players

  31. The Athletic’s Sickels has 5 prospects from the Dodgers in his Top 100.

    4) Gavin Lux
    14) Dustin May
    31) Keibert Ruiz
    84) Josiah Gray
    95) Jeter Downs

  32. A proposal
    Betts to Dodgers
    Price to Angels
    Boston gives Angels $10M
    Dodgers gives Angels $10M
    Ruiz, Grove, Verdugo to Boston

    1. So you’d be willing to pay out 40 million (approx. salary plus the 10 mil) plus give the Sox one of our top three prospects plus a starting outfielder with years of control remaining for one year of Betts?
      I’m fine with the deal you suggest if we sub Joc for Verdugo. What do you think?

  33. Betts or Lindor? Since these are both superstar players who I haven’t had the chance to watch on an everyday basis, at this time I have no preference. Since the Dodgers have scouted both players extensively, I will leave my trust in the hands of the professionals. As much as I like Verdugo, and as much as I would like to hold onto Ruiz, I don’t think this is a deal that the Dodgers could easily pass up.

    And as for the Dodgers ability to sign any player long term, I trust that AF has a strong grip on that issue. Also, a large part of any deal involves the Dodgers’ confidence that their deep farm system can absorb the loss of talent that they have to surrender.

    But let’s see if any of this stuff actually reaches fruition. For example, it seems that I was reading recently that Betts was unlikely to be dealt anywhere, and now all of a sudden a deal could be imminent. Frankly I don’t know what to believe.

    And although it adds to the debt structure, it also appears to me that the $100 million being spent this off-season on renovations is aimed at generating significant long term revenues that will enable the Dodgers to commit to long term player costs.

  34. That’s all for tonight folks!

    Tomorrow there will be a big announcement.

    See.. I don’t suffer fools very long… so something has to change… and it ain’t me.

    See you tomorrow with the news.

Comments are closed.